Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:17 pm
Location: Southern Oregon

Re: Most efficient speed

Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:45 pm

"...The averaging of the two runs is just to eliminate any effect of elevation change on the test runs...."

Oh. Fair enough. :)
Still need to be avoiding a route with too much elevation changes as while those offset each other significantly better than tail and head-winds do they still don't quite balance/average out.
{this message posted with 100% post consumer recycled electrons}
SE 2012 white with blue trim, powered by PV (~65%)
2015 Subaru Forester CVT
Two Trek street/trail bicycles optimized for mild around town use

Site Moderator
Posts: 2958
Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 3:55 pm
Location: Biloxi MS

Re: Most efficient speed

Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:50 pm

Even with head/tail winds, averaging a run in both directions will give you a more accurate measure of energy consumed than just using one or the other

If you were driving north/south with a 10 mph north wind, averaging the two runs should give you something pretty close to the energy you would use on a calm day I would think

2012 iMiEV SE Premium, White
2012 iMiEV SE Premium, Raspberry Metallic
2012 iMiEV SE, White
2017 Chevy Volt Premier
2014 Ford Transit Connect XLT SWB wagon

Site Moderator
Posts: 3845
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:47 am
Location: Silicon Valley, California

Re: Most efficient speed

Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:41 pm

Thought I'd link this thread to the iMiEV Range Chart from jumpjack which shows the (theoretical) decrease in range at very low speeds due to all the fixed loads powering the system. Without climate controls, the speed is about 12.5mph (20km/h). Has anyone taken any CaniOn data which might corroborate this?
EVs: 2 Wht/Blu SE Prem., '13 Tesla MS85, 3 156v CorbinSparrows (2 Li-ion), 24v EcoScoot(LiFePO4)
EV Conv: 156v '86 Ram PU, 144v '65 Saab 96
Hybrids: 48v1kW bike
ICE: '88 Isuzu Trooper. Mothballed: '67 Saab (orig.owner), '76 MBZ L206D RHD RV

Return to “Driving the iMiev - Range - Energy Efficiency - Operating Cost”